John Griffin's View On Divorce

John Griffin has some well thought out views of divorce he put together in a this video - Exiled: The Real Impact of Divorce on Men.

Griffin articulately states what everyone should agree with. The reason they do not is money. Money for the lawyers, judge, and litigants who believe they can get more than they deserve. 

Divorce Corp.- Still The Best Expose on Corruption

 Divorce Corp. is still the best expose on corruption in the divorce industry. 

The Corruption Of Politics

I'm not a Trump fan. Never was and never will be. I think he is the most corrupt president and his administration is the most corrupt we have ever had. Not only is Trump corrupt, he is openly, even farcically, corrupt. Much like our judicial system, especially family court. 

It never ceases to amaze me how judges and politicians can openly commit crimes and get away with them. Why is that? In politics, although nor really applicable to the judiciary, one reason may be that people are often willing to tolerate bad behavior because there are aspects of the person which they like. What do people like about Trump? He is supremely self-confident, he never backs down and is, frankly, a bully. People want their leader to be tough. 

There is a lesson here for Democrats.  Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris and even, my governor Tim Walz are not unflappable and seemed weak debating Trump and Vance. They were emotional and nervous. Note that Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were never nervous. 

If the Democrats want to win the next presidential election they need to find a candidate who is supremely confident and unflappable. They also need someone who, like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, is moderate, especially on social issues. 

It might seem surprising that I am talking politics on this site but the reality is we do not have much hope in rooting out corruption in the judiciary if we keep electing people who are corrupt. 

Cracks In The Wall Of Sexism - At Least In Denmark

Military conscription has been one of the most persistent areas of sexism but for Denmark this is changing. 

Danish women now face being called up for 11 months of military service when they turn 18, after a change in the law came into effect.

Under new rules passed by Denmark's parliament, women are to join teenage males in a lottery system that could require them to undertake a period of conscription.

The change was brought in as Nato countries boost defence spending amid heightened security concerns in Europe.

Up to now, women were allowed to participate in military service when they turned 18, but on a voluntary basis.

It always seems like the Scandinavian countries are the leaders when it comes to equality. 

Do Men and Women Judge Attractiveness Differently?

Do Men and Women Judge Attractiveness Differently?

I'm not too sure on this as I do not see their sources and these types of social science studies are often very poorly done and very often not reproducible. Furthermore, even when the studies are well done researchers tend to interpret the results to support their own biases.  

But I find it interesting because of the interpretations. 

Basically the claim is the attractiveness of a woman to a man is based on her physical attractiveness alone. How she dresses and her circumstances do not figure into it. Women, on the other hand ,view men who appear wealthy as being more attractive. 

Whether this is true or not, it is interesting to think of people's reaction to it. Like my friends.

I have one female friend who is borderline anti-male. She basically views life as men exploiting  women. If she had not seen the results of the study I am pretty sure she would have thought the wealthier looking woman would have been less attractive as she would be considered a threat by the man. With the results, she would think men are shallow and only care about looks. 

I honestly doubt there are many men who would not think status and wealth make a man more attractive but I have met men who, seeing the results, would state that women only care about money. Period. Which of course is wrong. 

I wish more people had an interest in and a better understanding of science. Maybe then they could better sort fact from opinion. 

Family Court Corruption

Here is a great video about family court corruption in Texas. The same is true for my state of Minnesota. 

Louise Perry On Dating

Louise Perry is a British journalist and author best known as a reactionary feminist which means she advocates for conservative traditional gender roles and values. 

There any many, many areas I disagree with Perry on but her views are interesting. 

In a discussion with Chris Williamson, she opines on the difficulties with dating for younger people. In her view, one the the major problems is woman filtering online dating applications to only select men who are far taller than average and with a much larger income that average. Essentially they are pre-selecting out many men who, if they had actually met, might have been happy with.